Obol - Uncertain Dynast

Emisor Lycia, Dynasts of
Año 520 BC - 480 BC
Tipo Standard circulation coin
Valor Obol (⅙)
Moneda Drachm
Composición Silver
Peso 0.8 g
Diámetro 10 mm
Grosor 2 mm
Forma Round (irregular)
Técnica Hammered, Incuse
Orientación Variable alignment ↺
Grabador(es)
En circulación hasta
Referencia(s) AMNG IV#806, SNG von Aulock#4102, Weber#8576
Descripción del anverso Forepart of boar, right.
Escritura del anverso
Leyenda del anverso
Descripción del reverso Forepart of man-headed bull, left, within incuse square.
Escritura del reverso
Leyenda del reverso
Canto
Casa de moneda
Tirada ND (520 BC - 480 BC) - -
ID de Numisquare 1630326510
Información adicional

Historical Context: This silver obol, issued by an uncertain dynast in Lycia between 520 and 480 BC, reflects a critical period. Lycia, characterized by semi-autonomous dynastic rule, navigated the complex geopolitical landscape between the Achaemenid Persian Empire and nascent Greek influence. Issuance of coinage, even small denominations like this obol, served as a potent assertion of local dynastic authority and economic autonomy, facilitating regional commerce and marking a significant transition to standardized monetary systems.

Artistry: The artistic execution of this obol, constrained by its diminutive 10 mm flan, typically reflects Lycia's prevailing Archaic style, blending indigenous Anatolian motifs with nascent Greek influences. Common designs often feature robust animal protomes, such as a lion or boar, rendered with characteristic Archaic vitality. The unknown engraver focused on creating a clear, recognizable image despite the small size, emphasizing bold outlines and essential features. This approach is characteristic of early die engraving, prioritizing immediate recognition for a circulating currency.

Technical/Grading: This 0.8 gram silver obol, a fractional denomination, often exhibits technical strike challenges typical of early Lycian issues. High points of the design—such as an animal's eye, snout, or mane—are frequently weakly struck due to uneven pressure or irregular flan preparation. Off-center strikes are also common, potentially obscuring portions of the design. A well-centered strike with strong definition on primary design elements, despite characteristic flan imperfections, represents a premium example for this often crudely produced Archaic type.

×