Katalog
| İhraççı | Arpi |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 325 BC - 275 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | Obol (⅙) |
| Para birimi | Drachm |
| Bileşim | Silver |
| Ağırlık | 0.62 g |
| Çap | 10 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | HN Italy#635, BMC Greek#3, GCV#322, Jameson#72, SNG ANS 1#633, SNG Copenhagen#602, SNG France#1224 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Horse prancing right. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | Greek |
| Ön yüz lejandı | A |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Fish-hook. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Greek |
| Arka yüz lejandı | Λ |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (325 BC - 275 BC) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 8608471880 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This silver obol, issued by the Daunian city of Arpi in Apulia between 325 and 275 BC, represents a critical period in Magna Graecia. Arpi, a prominent center, maintained significant autonomy despite the growing influence of Rome and the presence of Hellenistic powers like Pyrrhus of Epirus. The issuance of fractional denominations like this obol underscores the city's economic vitality and the necessity for small change in daily transactions, complementing its larger silver and bronze coinage. It reflects Arpi's independent minting authority during an era of shifting regional alliances.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, typical for fractional coinage of this era, the obol's design reflects the prevailing Hellenistic artistic conventions of Magna Graecia. The obverse commonly features a finely rendered head, often a deity such as Zeus or Persephone, exhibiting classical features and dignified expression. The reverse typically displays an animal, perhaps a boar or a horse, rendered with a degree of naturalism despite the coin's diminutive size. These designs, though small, served as civic identifiers and propaganda, showcasing Arpi's cultural sophistication.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 0.62 grams and measuring 10 millimeters, this obol is a diminutive example of ancient coinage. Key high-points for wear or strike weakness would include the hair and facial features of the obverse deity and the musculature or extremities of the reverse animal. Due to the manual striking process and small flan size, centering can often be imprecise, and the strike pressure might vary, leading to areas of flatness. Well-centered examples with full detail on both sides are considerably rarer, as these fractional pieces often saw extensive circulation, resulting in significant wear.