Katalog
| Emittent | Selge (Pisidia) |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 370 BC - 350 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Obol (⅙) |
| Währung | Drachm |
| Material | Silver |
| Gewicht | 1.06 g |
| Durchmesser | 10 mm |
| Dicke | |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Hammered, Incuse |
| Ausrichtung | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | SNG von Aulock#5241 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Facing gorgoneion with protruding tongue. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | |
| Averslegende | |
| Reversbeschreibung | Head of Athena to left, wearing crested Attic helmet adorned with olive leaves and tendril; all within incuse square. |
| Reversschrift | |
| Reverslegende | |
| Rand | |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
ND (370 BC - 350 BC) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 7902855040 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: This silver obol from Selge in Pisidia, struck 370-350 BC, dates to a period of increasing autonomy for Greek cities in Asia Minor as Achaemenid Persian influence waned. Selge, a prominent city in the mountainous interior, was celebrated for its fierce independence and martial traditions. This small denomination underscores Selge's economic participation in regional trade and its assertion of a distinct civic identity, vital for local commerce.
Artistry: The obol's design reflects Late Classical Greek artistry, infused with a powerful local character typical of Pisidian mints. While no specific engraver is known, the obverse typically depicts two wrestlers, a potent symbol of Selge’s athletic prowess and martial spirit. The reverse commonly features a sling and a triskeles, symbols likely representing local weaponry and dynamic motion, solidifying the city's unique cultural identity.
Technical/Grading: At 1.06 grams and 10 millimeters, this obol's small size poses inherent striking challenges. High-points for grading include the wrestlers’ heads, musculature, and the fine details of the sling and triskeles. Due to the diminutive flan, off-center strikes and areas of weakness are common. A premium example would display strong, well-centered details on both sides, minimal die wear, and an even strike, crucial for its numismatic quality.