⅙ Mohur - Bhupindar Singh

发行方 Princely state of Patiala (Indian princely states)
年份 1902
类型 Standard circulation coin
面值 ⅙ Mohur (2.5)
货币 Rupee
材质 Gold
重量 1.9 g
直径 16 mm
厚度
形状 Round
制作工艺 Milled
方向 Medal alignment ↑↑
雕刻师
流通至
参考资料 KM#14 , Fr#1090
正面描述 Lettering in Urdu regarding ruler and date.
正面文字 Urdu
正面铭文 vikram samvat 58
背面描述 Urdu lettering with upward facing dagger privy symbol.
背面文字 Urdu
背面铭文
边缘 Plain
铸币厂
铸造量 1958 (1902) - 1900 -
Numisquare 编号 1707708030
附加信息

Historical Context: This ⅙ Mohur, issued in 1902, hails from the Princely State of Patiala during the early reign of Maharaja Bhupindar Singh (1900-1938). Bhupindar Singh was a prominent and influential ruler under the British Raj, known for his progressive administration, loyalty to the British Crown, and later, his significant role as Chancellor of the Chamber of Princes. Gold coinage from Patiala, particularly fractional denominations like this, served not only as currency but also as a powerful symbol of the state's sovereignty and the Maharaja's wealth and prestige, reinforcing his authority within the intricate political landscape of early 20th-century India.

Artistry: The design of this diminutive gold coin adheres to the traditional numismatic aesthetics prevalent in Indian princely states. While the specific engraver remains anonymous, typical for issues of this period, the stylistic school reflects a blend of local Punjabi and broader Mughal influences. The obverse and reverse likely feature intricate legends in Gurmukhi script, identifying the ruler, mint (Patiala), and date (often in the Vikram Samvat calendar), possibly accompanied by a Katar (dagger) or a floral motif. The artistry emphasizes calligraphic precision within the constrained flan, a hallmark of indigenous Indian minting practices.

Technical/Grading: Struck in gold with a weight of 1.9 grams and a diameter of 16 millimeters, this ⅙ Mohur presents specific technical considerations for grading. High points for assessing wear and strike quality include the central Gurmukhi legends, where legibility and sharpness are paramount. Small devices, such as any accompanying symbols or decorative elements, should also retain their detail. Due to the small planchet and traditional striking methods, minor areas of weakness, particularly towards the rim or in the fields, are not uncommon. Luster should be strong for higher grades, reflecting the inherent qualities of gold coinage.

×