Mangir - Mehmed IV

Emitent Tripoli, Regency of
Rok 1683-1687
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nominał Mangir (1⁄80)
Waluta Akçe (1551-1687)
Skład Copper
Waga 1.34 g
Średnica 12.5 mm
Grubość
Kształt Round (irregular)
Technika
Orientacja
Rytownik(zy)
W obiegu do
Źródło(a) KM#7
Opis awersu Sultan name and mint
Pismo awersu Arabic
Legenda awersu سلطان محمد خان طرابلس
(Translation: Sultan Mehmed Khan Tripoli)
Opis rewersu Mint and date
Pismo rewersu Arabic
Legenda rewersu غرب ٩۴
(Translation: West 94)
Krawędź
Mennica
Nakład ND - 6 pointed star -
ND - hexagram ++ 40 -
1094 (1683) - ٩۴ -
1095 (1684) - ٩٥ -
1097 (1686) - ٩٧ -
1098 (1687) - ٩٨ -
ID Numisquare 1014646960
Dodatkowe informacje

Historical Context: This Mangir, issued by the Regency of Tripoli between 1683 and 1687, circulated during the reign of Ottoman Sultan Mehmed IV. As a key North African regency, Tripoli maintained administrative autonomy under Ottoman suzerainty. The issuance of low-denomination copper coinage like the mangir underscores local economic needs for everyday transactions. Mehmed IV's long reign (1648-1687) was a period of both expansion and significant challenges for the Ottoman Empire, making these provincial issues crucial for regional stability.

Artistry: The engraver of this particular mangir remains anonymous, typical for base metal coinage of the period. Stylistically, the coin reflects the prevalent Ottoman provincial aesthetic, characterized by legible Arabic script. Designs for such copper issues generally feature the reigning Sultan's name or a simplified toughra, along with the mint name of Tripoli and the regnal year. The small flan size of 12.5mm necessitates a concise and functional design, prioritizing clarity of inscription over intricate decorative elements.

Technical/Grading: Struck in copper, this 1.34-gram mangir from Tripoli often exhibits characteristics typical of provincial base metal production. High-points susceptible to wear include the raised elements of the calligraphic inscription. Technical strike qualities frequently vary, with irregular flan shapes and off-center strikes being common. Full details on both sides are rare, and even well-preserved examples may show weakness in the strike due to the inherent challenges of mass-producing small copper coinage with limited technology.

×