See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Kupang - Ahmad II/III

Issuer Sultanate of Samudra-Pasai
Year 1326-1452
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Kupang
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Central field displaying the Arabic legend in two lines reading 'al-Sultan al-Adil' (The Just Sultan), struck in a bold, informal Naskh hand. The inscription occupies the majority of the flan, with the characters showing the characteristic irregular depth and relief of hand-hammered dies. A continuous beaded border frames the design, consistent with the obverse treatment. The surface exhibits the natural flow lines and slight irregularity typical of medieval gold kupang coinage from Samudra-Pasai.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering السلطان العادل
(Translation: The just sultan)
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Samudra-Pasai, on the northern tip of Sumatra, was among the earliest Muslim polities in Southeast Asia, and its kupang coinage functioned as the primary medium of long-distance trade through the Malacca Strait during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Ibn Battuta visited the sultanate around 1345 and recorded its ruler as a devout Shafi'i Muslim who conducted theological debates at court — the same court authorizing these diminutive gold pieces. The wide date range attributed to Ahmad II/III reflects genuine uncertainty in the dynastic sequence, with historians still debating whether these represent one reign or two.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE