See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Kupang - Ahmad II/III

Issuer Sultanate of Samudra-Pasai
Year 1326-1452
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter 11 mm
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central field bearing the Arabic legend in two lines, executed in a bold, somewhat crude hammered style characteristic of early Southeast Asian Islamic coinage. The inscription reads 'Ahmad Malik al-Tahir' (Ahmad, the Pure King), rendered in an informal Naskh script. The legend is enclosed within a beaded border running along the entire circumference of the flan. The irregular, hand-struck flan displays typical surface variation associated with medieval hammered gold coinage of the region.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Samudra-Pasai, on the northern tip of Sumatra, was among the earliest Muslim polities in Southeast Asia, and its kupang coinage functioned as the primary medium of long-distance trade through the Malacca Strait during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Ibn Battuta visited the sultanate around 1345 and recorded its ruler as a devout Shafi'i Muslim who conducted theological debates at court — the same court authorizing these diminutive gold pieces. The wide date range attributed to Ahmad II/III reflects genuine uncertainty in the dynastic sequence, with historians still debating whether these represent one reign or two.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE