Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Sultanate of Samudra-Pasai |
|---|---|
| Year | 1326-1452 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | 11 mm |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Central field bearing the Arabic legend in two lines, executed in a bold, somewhat crude hammered style characteristic of early Southeast Asian Islamic coinage. The inscription reads 'Ahmad Malik al-Tahir' (Ahmad, the Pure King), rendered in an informal Naskh script. The legend is enclosed within a beaded border running along the entire circumference of the flan. The irregular, hand-struck flan displays typical surface variation associated with medieval hammered gold coinage of the region. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Samudra-Pasai, on the northern tip of Sumatra, was among the earliest Muslim polities in Southeast Asia, and its kupang coinage functioned as the primary medium of long-distance trade through the Malacca Strait during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Ibn Battuta visited the sultanate around 1345 and recorded its ruler as a devout Shafi'i Muslim who conducted theological debates at court — the same court authorizing these diminutive gold pieces. The wide date range attributed to Ahmad II/III reflects genuine uncertainty in the dynastic sequence, with historians still debating whether these represent one reign or two.