Katalog
| İhraççı | Ghurid dynasty |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 1173-1206 |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | 1 Jital (1⁄50) |
| Para birimi | Jital (879-1215) |
| Bileşim | Billon |
| Ağırlık | 2.9 g |
| Çap | 15 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | Tye#178.1 Islamic#1779L cat#17982 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Stylized bull left. Beaded border. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Four line inscription. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Arabic |
| Arka yüz lejandı | |
| Kenar | Plain |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (1173-1206) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 2777084770 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This billon Jital was issued during the reign of Muizz al-din Muhammad bin Sam, better known as Muhammad of Ghor, a pivotal figure of the Ghurid dynasty (1173-1206 CE). His campaigns fundamentally reshaped the political landscape of the Indian subcontinent, laying the groundwork for the Delhi Sultanate. Jitals, a widely circulating currency of the era, were instrumental in facilitating the economic and administrative consolidation of his expanding empire, marking a significant transition in regional power dynamics and the spread of Islamic influence.
Artistry: The design of this Jital, typical of Ghurid coinage, primarily features Arabic calligraphy, reflecting the aniconic tradition of Islamic numismatics. While specific engravers remain anonymous, the stylistic school blends traditional Islamic epigraphy with influences from earlier regional coinage, occasionally incorporating symbolic motifs. The small flan size often necessitates a compact arrangement of legends, conveying the ruler’s name, titles, and sometimes a mint or date, rendered in a functional yet elegant script characteristic of the period.
Technical/Grading: At 15mm and 2.9 grams, this billon Jital often exhibits characteristic strike qualities. High-points for evaluation include the clarity of the central legends, particularly the ruler’s name, and any surrounding decorative elements. Due to the small flan and billon composition, strikes are frequently uneven, often resulting in partial legends or off-center impressions. Detail on the outer margins or the very edges of the inscription is commonly weak, and planchet irregularities are not uncommon, impacting overall legibility and grade.