Hemiobol Gorgippia

Emitent Sindi (Skythia)
Rok 425 BC - 400 BC
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nominał Hemiobol (1⁄12)
Waluta Drachm
Skład Silver
Waga 0.31 g
Średnica 9 mm
Grubość
Kształt Round (irregular)
Technika Hammered, Incuse
Orientacja Variable alignment ↺
Rytownik(zy)
W obiegu do
Źródło(a) Anokhin#1200 , MacDonald#84 Bosporos#60 , HGC 7#6
Opis awersu Griffin seated right, barley grain before.
Pismo awersu
Legenda awersu
Opis rewersu Head of horse to right within shallow incuse square. Legend ΣΙΝΔΩ or ΣΙΝ.
Pismo rewersu Greek
Legenda rewersu ΣΙΝΔΩ
Krawędź
Mennica
Nakład ND (425 BC - 400 BC) - -
ID Numisquare 1551689630
Dodatkowe informacje

Historical Context: The Hemiobol of Gorgippia dates from the late 5th century BC, a pivotal period for the Sindi, a powerful Scythian tribe inhabiting the eastern Cimmerian Bosporus. This coinage represents the economic autonomy of Gorgippia, a significant Sindi settlement later Hellenized and integrated into the Bosporan Kingdom. Issuance of such small silver denominations underscores flourishing local trade and daily commerce within Sindi territories, reflecting growing Greek cultural and economic influence preceding full Bosporan political dominance.

Artistry: Given the minute 9mm flan, the artistry on this hemiobol is necessarily concise, reflecting practical constraints rather than elaborate sculptural detail. While a specific engraver is unknown, the stylistic school aligns with early Greek influences permeating the Bosporan region, often combined with indigenous Sindi motifs. Typical designs for such small issues include a simplified head of a local nymph or deity on the obverse, and a simple animal or symbolic device on the reverse, executed with a direct, functional aesthetic.

Technical/Grading: Weighing a mere 0.31 grams, this silver hemiobol presents significant technical challenges for striking and preservation. High-points, typically central features of any depicted head or animal, are frequently weakly struck or off-center due to small, often irregular flans and the manual striking process. Collectors should anticipate variability in strike quality, often manifesting as partial designs or areas of flatness. A well-centered example with clear rendering of primary devices, despite production limitations, would be considered exceptional.

×