کاتالوگ
| صادرکننده | Euromus (Caria) |
|---|---|
| سال | 400 BC - 350 BC |
| نوع | Standard circulation coin |
| ارزش | Hemiobol (1⁄12) |
| واحد پول | Drachm |
| ترکیب | Silver |
| وزن | 0.47 g |
| قطر | 9 mm |
| ضخامت | |
| شکل | Round (irregular) |
| تکنیک | Hammered |
| جهت | Variable alignment ↺ |
| حکاک(ها) | |
| در گردش تا | |
| مرجع(ها) | HN Online#1074 |
| توضیحات روی سکه | Forepart of boar right. |
|---|---|
| خط روی سکه | |
| نوشتههای روی سکه | |
| توضیحات پشت سکه | Bearded and laureate head of Zeus Lepsynos right. |
| خط پشت سکه | Greek |
| نوشتههای پشت سکه | ΛΕΨΥ |
| لبه | |
| ضرابخانه | |
| تیراژ ضرب |
ND (400 BC - 350 BC) - - |
| شناسه Numisquare | 5826416710 |
| اطلاعات تکمیلی |
Historical Context: This silver hemiobol, struck by the Carian city of Euromus between 400 BC and 350 BC, reflects a period of complex political dynamics. Euromus, though under Achaemenid Persian suzerainty, exercised significant local autonomy, including the right to mint its own coinage. This era saw powerful Carian dynasts blending Greek and indigenous cultures. The issuance of small denominations like this underscores the city's active regional commerce and economic self-sufficiency, facilitating daily transactions.
Artistry: The artistic execution of this hemiobol, characteristic of the Late Classical Greek style, is constrained by its diminutive 9mm size. Specific engravers are rarely identifiable for such fractional issues. The design typically features a simplified yet bold representation on the obverse, often a local patron deity or civic emblem. The reverse usually presents a more schematic symbol or the city's ethnic. The die-engraver's challenge was conveying a recognizable image with clarity within a very limited field.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 0.47 grams, this hemiobol’s technical production reflects the challenges of striking small flans. High-points of the design, like hair or facial features, or prominent reverse elements, are frequently susceptible to weakness of strike or early wear. Flan preparation was often rudimentary, leading to irregular shapes and off-center strikes. Full striking of both designs is uncommon, making well-centered examples with complete details particularly desirable. Reference HN Online#1074 confirms its identification.