Catalogue
| Émetteur | Federal Coinage of Phokis |
|---|---|
| Année | 485 BC - 480 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | Hemiobol (1⁄12) |
| Devise | Drachm |
| Composition | Silver |
| Poids | 0.35 g |
| Diamètre | 7.0 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered, Incuse |
| Orientation | |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | BCD Peloponnesos#199 |
| Description de l’avers | Profile head and neck of bull to right |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | Corinthian helmet to left in incuse square |
| Écriture du revers | |
| Légende du revers | |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (485 BC - 480 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 5606720590 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: This silver hemiobol, issued by Federal Coinage of Phokis between 485-480 BC, belongs to a pivotal period just prior to the Greco-Persian Wars. Its federal issuance signifies a collective economic and political identity among Phokian city-states, driven by regional alliances and trade needs. This era saw formalized inter-polis cooperation, essential for defense and local commerce. As a small denomination, the hemiobol served as vital small change for daily transactions within the Phokian koinon.
Artistry: While specific engravers remain anonymous for minute Early Classical issues, the coin's design reflects burgeoning artistic trends. Phokian hemiobols typically feature a stylized bull's head, often facing, on the obverse, a motif resonant with regional agricultural wealth or local cults. The reverse commonly displays a simple incuse square or minimalist symbol. Despite its diminutive 7.0 mm diameter, the engraver aimed for clarity, showcasing a transition from archaic stiffness towards naturalistic, compact representations.
Technical/Grading: Weighing a mere 0.35 grams, this silver hemiobol attests to ancient minting precision. Key high-points for wear, assuming a bull's head design, include the horns, eyes, and muzzle. Due to the small flan and hand-striking, minor off-centering, partial strikes, or slight flan irregularities are common. A well-struck example exhibits clear detail on the primary device, good metal flow, and minimal weakness in central design elements, despite the inherent challenges of striking such a tiny coin.