Katalog
| Emitent | Tragilos |
|---|---|
| Rok | 450 BC - 400 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Hodnota | Hemiobol (1⁄12) |
| Měna | Drachm |
| Složení | Silver |
| Hmotnost | 0.19 g |
| Průměr | 7.0 mm |
| Tloušťka | |
| Tvar | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered, Incuse |
| Orientace | |
| Rytci | |
| V oběhu do | |
| Reference | BMC Greek#5 |
| Popis líce | Bunch of grapes |
|---|---|
| Písmo líce | |
| Opis líce | |
| Popis rubu | Within the squares of a quadripartite incuse square |
| Písmo rubu | Greek |
| Opis rubu | Τ Ρ Α Ι |
| Hrana | |
| Mincovna | |
| Náklad |
ND (450 BC - 400 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 3365360670 |
| Další informace |
Historical Context: This silver hemiobol was issued by the ancient city of Tragilos in Thrace between 450 BC and 400 BC. Positioned strategically in the Strymonic Gulf region, Tragilos, though a smaller polis, asserted its economic autonomy by minting its own fractional coinage. This period, encompassing the Peloponnesian War, saw numerous Greek cities issuing small denominations like the hemiobol to facilitate daily commerce and regional trade, particularly with inland Thracian tribes and for transactions involving local resources like silver from nearby mines.
Artistry: The coin reflects the High Classical Greek artistic tradition, characterized by naturalism and idealized forms, despite the extremely diminutive flan of 7.0 mm. While no specific engraver is attributed, the artistry on such minute pieces presented significant challenges. Typical designs for Tragilos hemiobols of this era often featured a finely rendered head, possibly Apollo or Dionysus, on the obverse, paired with a local emblem like a bunch of grapes or a kantharos on the reverse, sometimes accompanied by the initial letters of the city's name.
Technical/Grading: Weighing a mere 0.19 gg, this hemiobol's technical qualities are crucial for its assessment. High-points susceptible to wear typically include the hair and facial features on the obverse and the raised elements of the reverse device. Given its small size, weak strikes and off-centering are common, often resulting in incomplete details or legends. A well-struck example would exhibit clear central devices, good flan shape, and minimal die wear, allowing for legibility of the iconography despite the inherent limitations of this fractional denomination.