Katalog
| Emittent | Tauromenion |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 317 BC - 275 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Hemilitron (1/2) |
| Währung | Litra |
| Material | Bronze |
| Gewicht | 6.49 g |
| Durchmesser | 20 mm |
| Dicke | |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Hammered |
| Ausrichtung | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | CNS#7 , Campana#12 , HGC 2#1591 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Laureate head of Apollo left; APXEΓETAΣ to left. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Greek |
| Averslegende | APXEΓETAΣ |
| Reversbeschreibung | Bull butting right; ΣN in exergue. |
| Reversschrift | Greek |
| Reverslegende | ΣN |
| Rand | |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
ND (317 BC - 275 BC) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 7789606060 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: This Æ Hemilitron was issued by Tauromenion, a Greek polis in eastern Sicily, during the tumultuous period of 317 BC to 275 BC. This era saw intense geopolitical struggles, notably the campaigns of Agathocles of Syracuse and later Pyrrhus of Epirus, against Carthaginian and other regional powers. Tauromenion, strategically located, navigated these conflicts, often aligning with Syracuse or striving for autonomy. The coin’s production underscores the city’s economic vitality and assertion of civic identity amidst persistent external pressures.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, the artistry of this bronze coin reflects late Classical to early Hellenistic Greek stylistic traditions. Civic bronzes of Tauromenion typically featured local patron deities or symbols. Common obverse types include the head of Apollo, often rendered with classical idealism, while reverses might depict a tripod. The execution aimed for clarity, albeit often with simpler details compared to contemporary silver, yet still conveying local pride and cultural adherence.
Technical/Grading: This Æ Hemilitron, weighing 6.49 grams and measuring 20 millimeters, falls within expected specifications. As a hammered bronze issue, strike quality varies. Key high-points, such as hair and facial features on a deity’s portrait or intricate elements of a symbolic device, are critical for assessing detail retention. A well-struck example exhibits strong, even relief and good centering, minimizing flatness. Surface preservation, including patination and absence of significant corrosion, is paramount for optimal grading.