Catálogo
| Emisor | Piakos |
|---|---|
| Año | 420 BC - 400 BC |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valor | Hemilitron (1/2) |
| Moneda | Litra |
| Composición | Bronze |
| Peso | 5.79 g |
| Diámetro | 18.0 mm |
| Grosor | |
| Forma | Round (irregular) |
| Técnica | Hammered |
| Orientación | |
| Grabador(es) | |
| En circulación hasta | |
| Referencia(s) | HGC 2#1100, Campana#1 |
| Descripción del anverso | Laureate head of river god left; Π•Ι•Α•Κ•Ι•Ν• before |
|---|---|
| Escritura del anverso | Greek |
| Leyenda del anverso | Π Ι Α Κ Ι Ν |
| Descripción del reverso | Hound attacking stag right. Acorn to left, oak leaf to right |
| Escritura del reverso | |
| Leyenda del reverso | |
| Canto | |
| Casa de moneda | |
| Tirada |
ND (420 BC - 400 BC) - - |
| ID de Numisquare | 2458482040 |
| Información adicional |
Historical Context: This Hemilitron was issued by Piakos, likely a local dynastic ruler or community in ancient Lycia or Caria, during the late Classical period (420-400 BC). This era, marked by the Peloponnesian War, saw significant decentralization and the emergence of numerous local coinages, particularly in Anatolia. Such bronze issues served crucial economic functions, providing small change for daily transactions and asserting local autonomy amidst shifting regional powers.
Artistry: The engraver of this Hemilitron remains anonymous, typical for local bronze issues. Stylistically, it would belong to a regional Anatolian school, incorporating iconographic elements reflecting local cults, mythology, or civic identity. While the precise design is not specified, such issues commonly depicted local deities, animals, or symbols pertinent to the issuing authority, often rendered with a more rustic charm compared to major Greek mints, conveying a distinct local character.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 5.79 grams and measuring 18.0 mm, this bronze Hemilitron exhibits typical specifications for fractional denominations. Bronze flans from this period are frequently irregular, and strikes can vary in quality, often showing off-center alignments or areas of weakness. High-points, such as facial features, hair, or raised elements of an animal’s anatomy, would be the first to show wear, impacting the overall grade. The fabric often displays characteristic surface corrosion inherent to ancient bronze coinage.