Каталог
| Эмитент | Ephesos |
|---|---|
| Год | 625 BC - 600 BC |
| Тип | Standard circulation coin |
| Номинал | Hemihekte (5⁄3) |
| Валюта | Drachm |
| Состав | Electrum |
| Вес | 1.18 g |
| Диаметр | 7.0 mm |
| Толщина | |
| Форма | Round (irregular) |
| Техника | Hammered, Incuse |
| Ориентация | |
| Гравёр(ы) | |
| В обращении до | |
| Каталожные номера | BostonMFA#1816, GCV#3474 |
| Описание аверса | Forepart of a stag to right, his head reverted to left |
|---|---|
| Письменность аверса | |
| Надписи аверса | |
| Описание реверса | Incuse square with irregular pattern |
| Письменность реверса | |
| Надписи реверса | |
| Гурт | |
| Монетный двор | |
| Тираж |
ND (625 BC - 600 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 3420773750 |
| Дополнительная информация |
Historical Context: This electrum hemihekte, issued by Ephesos (625-600 BC), marks a pivotal moment in early coinage. Ephesos, a prominent Ionian city, adopted this technology, influenced by Lydian neighbors. The inscription 'ΦΑΝΟΣ' (Phanes) signifies one of the earliest named issuers, suggesting a wealthy merchant or magistrate guaranteeing its value, predating widespread state currency. This fractional denomination highlights the developing need for smaller transactional units in a burgeoning commercial economy.
Artistry: The coin's obverse features the forepart of a stag, head reverted, rendered in a powerful Archaic Greek style. The stag, sacred to Artemis, Ephesos' patron deity, firmly links the coinage to the city's civic and religious identity. The anonymous engraver created an enduring symbol. Below the stag, the legendary 'ΦΑΝΟΣ' inscription is incorporated. The reverse bears a simple, often striated, incuse square punch, typical of earliest minting practices, serving as a countermark for the obverse die.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a small, irregular electrum flan (1.18 gg, 7.0 mmmm), this hemihekte shows challenges of early coinage production. Key high-points for evaluation include the stag’s head and the clarity of the 'ΦΑΝΟΣ' legend. Rudimentary striking methods often result in off-center strikes, uneven pressure, and variable flan shapes. A premium is placed on specimens with a well-centered obverse, a complete and legible inscription, and a strong strike clearly rendering the stag's features, despite Archaic minting limitations.