Katalog
| Emitent | Cherronesos (Thrace) |
|---|---|
| Rok | 357 BC - 320 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Hodnota | Hemidrachm (1/2) |
| Měna | Drachm |
| Složení | Silver |
| Hmotnost | 2.39 g |
| Průměr | 13 mm |
| Tloušťka | |
| Tvar | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered, Incuse |
| Orientace | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Rytci | |
| V oběhu do | |
| Reference | CN type#21554 |
| Popis líce | Forepart of a lion to right, head turned back to left. |
|---|---|
| Písmo líce | |
| Opis líce | |
| Popis rubu | Quadripartite incuse square with alternating raised and sunken quarters; in two sunken quarters: rooster, pellet, H in raised quarter. |
| Písmo rubu | |
| Opis rubu | |
| Hrana | |
| Mincovna | |
| Náklad |
ND (357 BC - 320 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6826720000 |
| Další informace |
Historical Context: This silver hemidrachm, issued by Cherronesos in Thrace between 357 BC and 320 BC, marks a critical period. The Chersonesus Thracica, a strategic peninsula, was contested between declining Athenian influence and burgeoning Macedonian power. These civic issues were vital for local economic stability, facilitating Aegean and Black Sea trade, reflecting the collective identity and commercial needs of Chersonesan cities during a transformative era.
Artistry: The 'Dot/rooster/H' type exemplifies robust civic artistry of the Late Classical to Early Hellenistic period. Engraver anonymity is typical for municipal issues; the style adheres to naturalistic tendencies. The obverse features a distinctive 'Dot,' likely a specific symbolic mark. The reverse prominently displays a rooster, a motif often associated with vigilance or local cults, accompanied by the initial 'H,' possibly denoting a specific city or magistrate within the Chersonesan federation.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a 13mm silver flan weighing 2.39 grams, this hemidrachm reflects the practical demands of ancient small change. Key grading considerations include the sharpness of the obverse 'Dot' and the definition of the rooster's comb, wattle, and tail feathers on the reverse, these being high points susceptible to wear. Evaluation also focuses on overall strike quality, centering, and flan integrity, as irregular shapes and off-center strikes are common for such diminutive issues, reflecting the era's production methods.