See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Hemidrachm

Issuer Cherronesos
Year 386 BC - 338 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Hemidrachm (1/2)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Quadripartite incuse square divided by a raised linear cross into four equal compartments, two of which are left plain while the remaining two contain symbolic devices: a stylized floral or leaf motif in the upper left quarter, and a pellet together with a recumbent archaic letter (lunate epsilon or comparable symbol) in the lower right quarter. The alternating incuse and relief treatment of the quarters is characteristic of the standard reverse type of Chersonesos hemidrachms throughout the 4th century BC.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Chersonesos — the Thracian peninsula city, not to be confused with the Crimean settlement of the same name — produced these hemidrachms in enormous quantities over roughly five decades, making them one of the most widely circulated silver fractions in the northern Aegean. Their ubiquity in hoards from Bulgaria to western Turkey suggests they functioned as a regional fractional currency well beyond the city's immediate sphere. The type was imitated so frequently by neighboring mints that distinguishing genuine Chersonesean strikes from contemporaneous copies remains a persistent attribution problem, even with the McClean and Copenhagen references to anchor the series.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE