カタログ
| 発行体 | Olympia (Elis) |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 470 BC - 460 BC |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | Hemidrachm (1/2) |
| 通貨 | Aeginetic drachm |
| 材質 | Silver |
| 重量 | 2.88 g |
| 直径 | 14 mm |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 製造技法 | Hammered, Incuse |
| 向き | Variable alignment ↺ |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 | BCD Olympia#11 , Jameson#2094 Lockett#2386 , Traité III#1038 , HGC 5#422 Delepierre#2040-2041 |
| 表面の説明 | Eagle flying left with wings above and below his body, grasping snake in his beak and talons. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | |
| 表面の銘文 | |
| 裏面の説明 | Thunderbolt with wings above and volutes below. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | Greek |
| 裏面の銘文 | F A |
| 縁 | |
| 鋳造所 | |
| 鋳造数 |
ND (470 BC - 460 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 3669130200 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context: This Hemidrachm, struck by Elis for Olympia (470-460 BC), emerges from a pivotal post-Persian Wars era. This period saw a surge in Hellenic identity and cultural prominence, with the Olympic Games at its heart. As custodians, Elis issued coinage to assert authority and facilitate commerce during the quadrennial festivals. Dated to the 78th-82nd Olympiads, it reflects Olympia's central role in Panhellenic unity and the early Classical period's profound development.
Artistry: While the engraver remains anonymous, this Hemidrachm exemplifies the nascent Early Classical style, moving beyond Archaic rigidity towards greater naturalism. Typical Olympia designs feature the majestic eagle, sacred to Zeus, often depicted in flight or standing, on the obverse. The reverse commonly displays a thunderbolt, Zeus's powerful symbol, or occasionally a laureate head of the Olympian god. Artistry, though constrained by the small flan, aims for a dignified representation befitting the sanctuary's supreme deity.
Technical/Grading: Struck in silver, this Hemidrachm weighs 2.88 grams and measures 14 millimeters, a significant fractional denomination. Key high-points for grading include intricate feathering (eagle), distinct volutes (thunderbolt), or fine details of Zeus's hair/beard, depending on the design. Small flans often result in minor off-centering or incomplete peripheral strikes. However, central devices are typically well-executed, demonstrating competent minting for the era, with strong examples showing sharp detail.