Katalog
| Emitent | Thourioi |
|---|---|
| Rok | 300 BC - 280 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | Hemichalkon (1⁄96) |
| Waluta | As |
| Skład | Bronze |
| Waga | 1.14 g |
| Średnica | 9.5 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | BMC Gr/It#119, SNG ANS 2#1195 |
| Opis awersu | Head of Athena wearing a crested Attic helmet to right. |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Bull`s head facing, adorned with fillets. |
| Pismo rewersu | Greek |
| Legenda rewersu | ΘΟΥ Φ - Ι |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (300 BC - 280 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 7131924750 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This Hemichalkon was issued by the city of Thourioi in Magna Graecia between 300 BC and 280 BC. This period represents a turbulent phase in Southern Italy, marked by the decline of independent Greek city-states amidst increasing Roman expansion and shifting Hellenistic alliances. Thourioi, a prominent Achaean colony, relied on such bronze fractional coinage to facilitate local commerce and daily transactions, complementing its more valuable silver issues. The coin reflects the city's economic resilience and continued civic autonomy during an era of profound geopolitical change.
Artistry: While specific engravers for smaller denominations are rarely known, the artistry of this bronze Hemichalkon reflects refined Hellenistic stylistic trends prevalent in Magna Graecia. Despite its diminutive size (9.5 mm), the coin would have featured a characteristic Thourioi motif, likely a deity such as Athena or a symbolic animal, rendered with considerable skill. The design aimed for naturalism and clarity, showcasing the city's cultural identity even on a utilitarian issue. The engraver’s challenge was to imbue a small flan with recognizable and aesthetically pleasing imagery.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 1.14 grams, this Hemichalkon’s technical quality is assessed by the sharpness of its details, particularly on the highest relief points such as hair or musculature. Given its small diameter and bronze composition, a well-struck example exhibits good centering and minimal flan imperfections. Corrosion is a common issue for ancient bronzes, often obscuring surface detail. Collectors seek examples with clear devices, legible legends (if any), and a stable, even patina, indicating careful preservation and a strong initial strike for this fractional currency.