Katalog
| İhraççı | Skotoussa |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 394 BC - 367 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | Hemichalkon (1⁄96) |
| Para birimi | Drachm |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 1.40 g |
| Çap | 11.0 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered, Incuse |
| Yönlendirme | |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | BCD Thessaly I#1339 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Head of bearded Dionysos to right, wearing ivy wreath |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Bunch of grapes hanging from branch; all within shallow circular incuse |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Greek |
| Arka yüz lejandı | Σ ΚΟ T |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (394 BC - 367 BC) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 4869947000 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This Hemichalkon was issued by Skotoussa in Thessaly during 394-367 BC. This era was marked by regional instability, including the rise of tyrants like Jason of Pherae. Despite its modest size, Skotoussa asserted its autonomy and the crucial right to mint coinage, a clear symbol of its civic independence. This small bronze denomination was essential for local commerce, facilitating daily transactions within the city-state and its surrounding agricultural lands.
Artistry: The specific engraver of this diminutive Hemichalkon is unknown, yet its design would follow prevailing Thessalian numismatic styles. Given the coin's 11.0 mm diameter, the artistic challenge was to render clear, recognizable iconography within a restricted field. Common motifs for Skotoussa often included local deities like Athena or Zeus, or symbols representing the city's identity, executed with a balance of detail and legibility typical of late classical Greek provincial issues.
Technical/Grading: The technical execution of this 1.40-gram bronze Hemichalkon is vital for assessment. High-points prone to wear would typically be the highest relief areas of the obverse and reverse designs, such as a deity's hair or an animal's musculature. A superior example would feature a strong, well-centered strike, ensuring full visibility of all design elements. Flaws like off-centering, weak striking, or significant die wear are common for small bronze issues, affecting their overall grade and desirability.