| Issuer | Duchy of Saxe-Eisenach (German States) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1716-1717 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 1 Heller (1⁄1152) |
| Currency | Thaler (1596-1809) |
| Composition | Copper |
| Weight | |
| Diameter | |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round |
| Technique | |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | KM#52 Merse#4101 |
| Obverse description | Crowned Saxony arms between palm branches. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | 3-line inscription with denomination and date. |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | *E* HELLER *1717* |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
1716 - - 1717 - - |
| Numisquare ID | 4774351940 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Heller, dated 1716-1717, was issued under Johann Wilhelm, Duke of Saxe-Eisenach (r. 1698-1729). As a sovereign duchy within the fragmented Holy Roman Empire, Saxe-Eisenach required low-denomination copper coinage like the Heller for daily commerce. Its issuance reflects the economic stability and the ruler's provision for his populace's transactional needs during a period of cultural and architectural development in the territory. Such coins were fundamental to local trade.
Artistry: The artistic execution of this Heller is typical of utilitarian coinage from minor German states in the early 18th century. A specific engraver is rarely attributed for such low-value issues. The style reflects a simplified, functional Baroque aesthetic, prioritizing legibility and clear identification of the issuing authority. Designs commonly feature the ducal monogram (e.g., 'JW') or the traditional Saxon arms, rather than elaborate portraiture or complex allegorical scenes, focusing on concise heraldry and dating.
Technical/Grading: Given its copper composition and low denomination, this Heller is prone to wear and environmental damage. Key high-points for assessing grade include the clarity of the central monogram or arms, particularly fine details within the ducal crown or the crancelin of the Saxon shield. The legibility of the date, often struck with less force, is also critical. Wear typically manifests on the highest design points and the outer rim, followed by overall field flatness and potential porosity.