Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Sasanian Empire (Sasanian Empire (224-651)) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 610-630 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Two imperial figures standing facing, identified as Heraclius and Heraclius Constantine, each wearing crown and imperial robes and holding a globus cruciger; a cross is depicted above between the two effigies. The style is characteristic of late Byzantine coin types struck under Sasanian occupation, with notably crude workmanship compared to contemporary Byzantine metropolitan issues. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Greek |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Between 613 and 628, Sasanian forces under Shahrbaraz occupied Syria, Egypt, and much of Anatolia in the most devastating Persian advance into Roman territory since the Achaemenid period. The Byzantine administrative and monetary apparatus in these regions effectively collapsed. Local mints either shut down or, in some documented cases, continued striking Byzantine-type bronze under Sasanian tolerance — producing pieces whose attribution remains genuinely contested among specialists.
This follis falls into that uncertain zone: struck to Byzantine fabric, carrying Byzantine imagery, yet issued under Persian occupation. Whether it represents Byzantine continuity, Sasanian acquiescence, or opportunistic local production is a question the coin itself cannot answer.