Katalog
| Emitent | |
|---|---|
| Rok | |
| Typ | Fantasy coin |
| Nominał | |
| Waluta | |
| Skład | Bronze |
| Waga | 9.74 g |
| Średnica | 28.9 mm |
| Grubość | 1.9 mm |
| Kształt | Round |
| Technika | |
| Orientacja | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) |
| Opis awersu | Gentleman with period hairstyle facing left |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | Latin |
| Legenda awersu | ONE DUBLOON 1751 |
| Opis rewersu | Three masted galleon sailing to left |
| Pismo rewersu | Latin |
| Legenda rewersu | ONE DUBLOON 1751 |
| Krawędź | Plain |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND - - |
| ID Numisquare | 1172573860 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This "Fantasy Coin - One Doubloon" represents a modern numismatic creation, deliberately crafted to evoke the iconic Spanish colonial doubloon without claiming an authentic historical provenance. Lacking specific issuer or year data, it exists outside established minting authorities, serving as a speculative or commemorative piece rather than currency from a defined historical era. Its designation as a "doubloon" immediately places it within a rich tradition of significant gold coinage, suggesting a romanticized vision of exploration, trade, or pirate lore, even in its bronze composition.
Artistry: The artistry of this fantasy piece, while not attributable to a historical engraver or school, typically aims to capture the aesthetic spirit of early modern coinage. Designs often feature imaginative heraldry, stylized maritime motifs, or allegorical figures consistent with the "doubloon" theme. The intent is usually to present a visually compelling narrative that aligns with popular perceptions of historical treasure, employing relief sculpture and lettering that mimics period styles, even if the specific iconography is purely fictional.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze, weighing 9.74 grams and measuring 28.9 millimeters, this piece deviates from the historical gold standard of true doubloons, indicating its fantasy status. Technical strike quality would be assessed on the sharpness of details, consistency of the planchet, and definition of the fields. High-points to observe for wear or strike weakness would include any central devices, portraits, or intricate elements of the imagined crests. The choice of bronze suggests it might be a proof-of-concept, a souvenir, or a base-metal interpretation.