Catalogus
| Uitgever | Tabriz, City of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Hammered |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Arabic |
| Opschrift voorzijde | فلوس ضرب تبریز (Translation: Struck in Tabriz) |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Anonymous copper falus from Tabriz present a persistent attribution problem — the absence of a ruler's name places them outside the standard dynastic sequence, and scholars continue to debate whether such pieces reflect municipal or bazaar-level authority, emergency stopgap production, or simply a mint operating between sovereignties. Tabriz changed hands repeatedly across the Safavid, Ottoman, and Afsharid periods, and anonymous copper issues cluster suspiciously around those intervals of contested control.