Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Roman Imperial Mint |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 72-73 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Round (irregular) |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (72-73) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Vespasian struck this issue during the consolidation following the Year of the Four Emperors and the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem — the Pax Augusta reverse was a deliberate political message, not a decorative choice. The civil war of 69 AD had left the Roman treasury gutted and the mint system in disarray; Vespasian's early bronze coinage was partly an exercise in restoring public confidence in the currency itself.
The S C authorization mark on bronze and orichalcum issues had, by this point, become largely ceremonial — Senate control over base metal coinage was nominal under Flavian rule.