See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Ducaton `Zilveren Rijder` piedfort at double weight

Issuer Province of Gelderland (Dutch Republic)
Year 1659-1680
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Ducaton (3)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The crowned coat of arms of the United Provinces of the Netherlands occupies the central field, flanked on each side by a rampant lion serving as supporter, each facing inward toward the shield. The date appears in the upper field, divided by the mintmark and privy mark (a seated dog). The reverse legend is inscribed in Latin along the periphery, separated by pellets. The overall composition is symmetrical and formal, reflecting the standard iconographic program of Dutch provincial silver coinage of the period.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Piedforts of the Zilveren Rijder were never intended for circulation — produced at double the standard flan weight, they served as presentation pieces and official record strikes, distributed to magistrates, mint officials, and occasionally foreign dignitaries as proof of die authenticity and minting rights. Gelderland maintained its own mint at Harderwijk with considerable jealousy, frequently clashing with the States-General over the right to strike rijders independently of Holland's preferred uniformity agreements.

The twenty-year span of this type reflects ongoing die use rather than continuous production. Individual piedfort strikes were likely made in very small numbers at irregular intervals, which explains the bibliographic chaos — Voogt, Delmonte, and KM do not fully agree on die marriage attributions within the series.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE