Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Alchon Huns |
|---|---|
| Year | 530-570 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Coin alignment ↑↓ |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Brahmi |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Toramana II ruled a diminished Alchon domain during a period of sustained pressure from the Sasanian Empire to the west and the early Turkic confederacies to the north. His coinage — struck in billon rather than the silver that earlier Alchon issues approached — reflects the fiscal strain of that squeeze. The metal degradation across his series is consistent and deliberate, not accidental.
Göbl's Kushan classification places this type within a broader cataloging framework originally designed for Kushan proper, a recurring source of frustration among specialists who argue the Alchons warrant a fully independent typology.