Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Drachm - Later Gupta or Imitative

Uitgever Gupta Empire
Jaar 400-600
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Standing or seated figure visible in a highly debased and schematic form, consistent with late Gupta reverse types derived from earlier regal prototypes. Surrounding the central device are blundered and illegible remnants of a Brahmi legend, heavily degenerated to the point of being non-readable, a hallmark of imitative or sub-Gupta coinage struck by local rulers or imitators. The strike is weak and uneven, with significant areas of flat or missing detail across the flan.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The later Gupta silver-copper issues represent a prolonged monetary debasement that tracked the empire's territorial fragmentation after Skandagupta's reign in the late 5th century. As Huna invasions destabilized the northwest and provincial governors asserted autonomy, central mint control dissolved — many of these small billon pieces were struck by successor kingdoms or local authorities imitating Gupta types they no longer had the political authority to issue legitimately. Attribution between "later Gupta" and "imitative" remains genuinely unresolved for most specimens.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT