| 発行体 | Kings of Cappadokia |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 6-7 |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | Drachm (1) |
| 通貨 | Drachm |
| 材質 | Silver |
| 重量 | 3.72 g |
| 直径 | 18 mm |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 製造技法 | Hammered |
| 向き | Variable alignment ↺ |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 | I#3606 , Simonetta#6 Greek#4 7#857 , DCA#464 |
| 表面の説明 | Diademed head of Archelaus, right; fillet border. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | |
| 表面の銘文 | |
| 裏面の説明 | Club; around, ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΑΡΧΕΛΑΟΥ ΦΙΛΟΠΑΤΡΙΔΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΚΤΙΣΤΟΥ; in field, M - B (date). |
| 裏面の文字体系 | Greek |
| 裏面の銘文 | ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΑΡΧΕΛΑΟΥ ΦΙΛΟΠΑΤΡΙΔΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΚΤΙΣΤΟΥ Μ B |
| 縁 | |
| 鋳造所 | |
| 鋳造数 |
ND (6-7) - RY 42 - |
| Numisquare ID | 1316733130 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context: This silver drachm was issued by Archelaus, the last King of Cappadocia, in 6-7 AD. Appointed by Mark Antony and confirmed by Augustus, Archelaus ruled as a crucial Roman client king for over 50 years, bringing stability to a vital region. This dating places the coin at the very end of his reign, just prior to his summons to Rome by Emperor Tiberius and Cappadocia's subsequent annexation. It reflects his authority in Caesarea before direct Roman imperial control.
Artistry: Struck by an anonymous engraver at the royal mint in Caesarea, this coin blends Hellenistic tradition with Roman imperial influence, typical of client kingdom coinage. The obverse features a finely rendered, diademed portrait of King Archelaus, often reflecting contemporary Augustan-era styles. The reverse frequently depicts a symbolic motif like a club, referencing Hercules, or Tyche, embodying Caesarea's prosperity. The style emphasizes royal authority and regional identity within the Roman sphere.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 3.72 grams and measuring 18 mm, this silver drachm conforms to expected specifications. High-points on the obverse portrait include hair, nose, and cheekbone; reverse high-points depend on the specific motif. A well-struck example exhibits sharp details, good centering, and minimal die wear. Flan quality is typically consistent, though minor irregularities are common. References like Simonetta#6 and DCA#464 are crucial for authentication and cataloging this specific issue.