Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Alchon Huns |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 536 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Drachm (380-560 AD) |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Pahlavi |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | 536 - Unknown mint |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The Alchon Huns struck imitations of Sasanian drachms as a deliberate policy of monetary credibility — their own populations and trading partners understood Khosrau II's coinage, and deviation meant friction. What makes this type genuinely interesting is the chronological problem it presents: Khosrau II did not begin his reign until 591, yet Alchon political power in the northwest was effectively broken by the mid-sixth century, making any precise attribution of date a working hypothesis rather than established fact.
Göbl's EM 271/A classification reflects a transitional die group where Alchon celators began introducing subtle deviations from the Sasanian prototype — degraded at the margins, legible enough at the center to pass.