Drachm

Émetteur Sagalassos
Année 36 BC - 25 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Valeur Drachm (1)
Devise Drachm
Composition Silver
Poids 3.36 g
Diamètre 17.0 mm
Épaisseur
Forme Round (irregular)
Technique Hammered
Orientation
Graveur(s)
En circulation jusqu’à
Référence(s) SNG von Aulock#5154
Description de l’avers Laureate head of Zeus facing right
Écriture de l’avers
Légende de l’avers
Description du revers Cornucopiae and the letter A to the left
Écriture du revers Greek
Légende du revers
Tranche
Atelier
Tirage ND (36 BC - 25 BC) - -
ID Numisquare 5790415720
Informations supplémentaires

Historical Context: This silver drachm from Sagalassos, a significant Pisidian city, dates to 36-25 BC, a tumultuous period marking the transition from the Roman Republic to Octavian's Principate. Sagalassos, though under Roman hegemony, retained local autonomy, evidenced by its right to issue coinage. The production of silver drachms, aligning with the Roman denarius standard, highlights the city's economic importance and integration into the broader Mediterranean monetary system during a critical phase for the Roman East.

Artistry: The drachm's design adheres to the Hellenistic numismatic tradition prevalent in Asia Minor, subtly reflecting burgeoning Roman influence. While no specific engraver is recorded, the artistry typically displays a competent hand. The obverse features a finely rendered laureate head of Zeus with a majestic, idealized profile, characteristic of classical divine portraiture. The reverse commonly presents an eagle standing upon a thunderbolt, a potent symbol of Zeus and Roman imperial power, executed with precise detail in its feathers and posture, often accompanied by civic monograms.

Technical/Grading: Struck on a 17.0 mm flan, this 3.36 gram silver drachm typically exhibits varying strike quality. High points for wear and strike analysis on the obverse include Zeus's highest hair strands, brow, and nose tip. On the reverse, the eagle's breast, wing tips, and head are critical areas. Common technical considerations include potential for slight off-centering, minor die wear causing flatness in peripheral legends, and occasional weakness in the strike, particularly on highest relief areas, which can obscure finer details.

×