Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Dinar - Hormizd I

Uitgever Indo-Sasanian Kingdom
Jaar 256-264
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Hammered
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Bactrian (Kushan)
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde The deity Shiva is depicted standing frontally before his sacred bull Nandi, both figures positioned on a ground line. Shiva is rendered wearing Sasanian royal garments and bearing a Sasanian-style diadem, with top-hair standing erect and the face shown in frontal view. He holds a trident in his left hand and a noose in his right hand, iconographic attributes consistent with Shaivite tradition as adopted in Kushano-Sasanian coinage. A Kushan dynastic legend borders the design in the field surrounding the figures. The synthesis of Sasanian regalia with Hindu iconography reflects the syncretic religious and artistic program characteristic of this coinage.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Hormizd I ruled for less than two years before dying in 270 AD, making his coinage among the briefest produced under any Sasanian monarch. The Indo-Sasanian issues attributed to his reign reflect the eastern frontier administration rather than the imperial mint at Ctesiphon, and Göbl's classification work on these dinars remains the baseline reference — Herzfeld's earlier numbering, used here, predates the more granular die studies that followed.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT