See full images — free registration
Continue with Google — it's free or register with email

Didrachm

Issuer Hierapytna
Year 200 BC - 67 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Bust of Tyche facing right, wearing a turreted mural crown adorned with battlements, her hair rendered in undulating wavy locks falling to the neck. The facial features are finely modelled in the Hellenistic style, with a delicate nose, slightly parted lips, and a prominent ear. A dotted border frames the design along the inner edge of the flan.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description An eagle with spread wings stands to the left beside a tall palm tree occupying the central field, the tree's fronds spreading prominently at the crown. The ethnic legend of the Hierapytnians is inscribed in two lines to the right of the palm, with ΙΕΡΑΠΥ appearing along the lower exergual area. The entire design is enclosed within a wreath border of olive leaves.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Hierapytna, on the southeastern coast of Crete, was among the most aggressive of the island's city-states — it absorbed neighboring Praisos around 145 BC and pursued territorial expansion well into the Roman period. This didrachm series spans that entire arc of ambition, from independence through the final resistance to Roman annexation, which ended with Crete's reduction to a province in 67 BC following Metellus's campaign.

Cretan mints of this period are notoriously difficult to sequence, and Svoronos's attributions have been disputed on die-study grounds more than once since his 1890 publication.