See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Dicken Saint Leodegar facing right, large shield

Issuer City of Lucerne
Year 1550-1601
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Round
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A large ornate shield of Lucerne — divided per pale, with a lily or floral sprig on the dexter side and a plain field on the sinister, inscribed with the letter L — is centered in the field. Above the shield, a displayed eagle with spread wings serves as a crest or crown element. The whole is enclosed within a beaded inner circle, with a circular Latin legend around the periphery reading MONETA NOVA LUCERNEN, with decorative stops separating the words.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Lucerne's Dicken coinage emerged from the Swiss Confederation's persistent need for large silver pieces capable of competing with the Thaler denominations flooding in from Habsburg mints. The city held the right to strike such coins by cantonal authority, and production across this half-century was intermittent — driven by trade demand rather than a continuous minting program.

Wielandt's classification of this specific variant under his Luzern sequence reflects a die study conducted decades after the fact; the original mint records for this period are fragmentary at best, making precise dating within the 1550–1601 window largely a matter of stylistic analysis.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE