Dichalkon - Tigranes I Nike

発行体 Armenia, Kingdom of
年号 123 BC - 96 BC
種類 Standard circulation coin
額面 Dichalkon (1⁄24)
通貨 Drachm
材質 Bronze
重量 4.25 g
直径 19 mm
厚さ
形状 Round (irregular)
製造技法 Hammered
向き
彫刻師
流通終了年
参考文献 Kovacs#67, Bedoukian CAA#6
表面の説明 Head of Tigranes I to left, wearing four-pointed tiara decorated with a star and tied with a diadem.
表面の文字体系
表面の銘文
裏面の説明 Nike standing right, holding wreath in her right hand; in field to right
裏面の文字体系
裏面の銘文 BAΣΙΛЄΩΣ / MЄΓAΛOY - [T]IΓPANOY / ΦΙΛЄΛΛHNOC
鋳造所
鋳造数 ND (123 BC - 96 BC) - -
Numisquare ID 5777944520
追加情報

Historical Context: This Dichalkon is attributed to Tigranes I, a figure of the burgeoning Artaxiad dynasty during a pivotal era for the Kingdom of Armenia (123 BC - 96 BC). This period witnessed Armenia's consolidation of power amidst the decline of the Seleucid Empire and rising Parthian influence, laying the groundwork for later expansion. The issuance of bronze coinage like this Dichalkon signifies the growing economic and political autonomy of the Armenian kingdom and its assertion of sovereignty in the late Hellenistic world.

Artistry: The coin’s design reflects a strong Hellenistic influence, characteristic of Artaxiad coinage. The obverse typically features a diademed portrait of the ruler, rendered with an idealized classical style, emphasizing royal authority and divine favor. The reverse prominently displays Nike, the goddess of victory, often depicted striding or holding a wreath. This motif, coupled with the ruler's name, underscores military successes and the aspirational triumphs of the Armenian kingdom. The engraver, though anonymous, demonstrates a proficient understanding of contemporary Greek numismatic aesthetics.

Technical/Grading: As a bronze Dichalkon, this issue (4.25 gg, 19 mmmm) often exhibits variable strike quality inherent to the medium. Key high-points for evaluation include the sharpness of the ruler's facial features, particularly the diadem and eye, on the obverse. On the reverse, the definition of Nike's wings, drapery, and any attributes held are critical. Centering, flan integrity, and the extent of wear on the relatively low relief elements are crucial factors in assessing the technical grade, with full details being rare due to typical bronze production methods.

×