کاتالوگ
| صادرکننده | Amphipolis, City of |
|---|---|
| سال | 148 BC - 30 BC |
| نوع | Standard circulation coin |
| ارزش | Chalkon (1⁄48) |
| واحد پول | Drachm |
| ترکیب | Bronze |
| وزن | 4.5 g |
| قطر | 19 mm |
| ضخامت | |
| شکل | Round (irregular) |
| تکنیک | Hammered |
| جهت | Variable alignment ↺ |
| حکاک(ها) | |
| در گردش تا | |
| مرجع(ها) |
| توضیحات روی سکه | Wreathed head of Demeter, right. |
|---|---|
| خط روی سکه | |
| نوشتههای روی سکه | |
| توضیحات پشت سکه | Lion walking right, city name above/below. |
| خط پشت سکه | Greek |
| نوشتههای پشت سکه |
ΑΜΦΙΠΟ ΛΙΤΟΝ (Translation: Amphipolis) |
| لبه | |
| ضرابخانه | |
| تیراژ ضرب |
ND (148 BC - 30 BC) - after 148BC - |
| شناسه Numisquare | 9920129500 |
| اطلاعات تکمیلی |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by the city of Amphipolis during the period of Roman provincial rule in Macedonia, following the region's annexation in 148 BC. As a strategically vital city and former capital of one of the four Macedonian merides, Amphipolis retained significant municipal autonomy, including the right to strike local bronze coinage. These issues served essential daily economic functions, facilitating commerce within the city and its immediate hinterland, reflecting a continued civic identity even under Roman suzerainty until the late Republican era.
Artistry: The engraver of this municipal bronze remains anonymous, characteristic of local issues from the late Hellenistic and early Roman provincial period. Stylistically, the coin adheres to Hellenistic tradition, often featuring a prominent deity or allegorical figure on the obverse, such as Artemis Tauropolos, a significant cult figure in Amphipolis. The reverse typically displays a civic emblem, perhaps a bull or a torch, rendered with local craftsmanship, preserving the city's cultural heritage distinct from dominant imperial aesthetics.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze, this Dichalkon weighs 4.5 grams and measures 19 millimeters, aligning with standard specifications for the denomination. High points for wear, depending on the specific design, typically include the hair and facial features of the obverse portrait, and prominent elements of the reverse device. Bronze issues from this period often exhibit variable strike quality, with irregular flans, off-centering, and uneven pressure, impacting the preservation of finer details. Corrosion is also a common factor affecting grade.