Catalogue
| Émetteur | Amphipolis, City of |
|---|---|
| Année | 187 BC - 167 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Devise | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Poids | 7.8 g |
| Diamètre | 19 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | HGC 4#423 7#95-103 |
| Description de l’avers | Diademed head of Poseidon right. |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | Club in wreath. |
| Écriture du revers | Greek |
| Légende du revers |
AMΦIΠOΛITΩN (Translation: Amphipolis) |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (187 BC - 167 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 4125404800 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon, issued by Amphipolis between 187 BC and 167 BC, circulated during a pivotal era in Macedonian history. Strategically located at the Strymon River mouth, Amphipolis was a vital center. This coinage predates the definitive Roman conquest and the establishment of the four Macedonian Merides in 167 BC, where Amphipolis became the capital of the First Meris. It reflects local civic authority during the reigns of the last Antigonid kings, Philip V and Perseus, amidst escalating conflicts with Rome, culminating in the Third Macedonian War.
Artistry: While the engraver remains anonymous, this Dichalkon exemplifies Hellenistic civic coinage. Such bronzes typically featured local deities or personifications significant to the city’s identity, rendered with characteristic Hellenistic realism. The artistic execution, often less refined than royal silver, aimed for clear, recognizable iconography, reflecting the city's cultural and religious affiliations. Common Amphipolitan types included Artemis Tauropolos or Olympian deities, executed with a blend of classical idealism and emerging realism.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 7.8 grams and 19 millimeters, this bronze Dichalkon is a standard module. For grading, key inspection areas include the highest points of the design—hair, facial features, or drapery folds—most susceptible to wear. Technical strike qualities vary; collectors assess centering, flan flaws (e.g., cracks or laminations), and strike sharpness. These can range from full and bold to slightly off-center or weakly struck, typical for mass-produced bronze issues.