Katalog
| Emitent | Tegea |
|---|---|
| Rok | 370 BC - 350 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Hodnota | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Měna | Drachm |
| Složení | Bronze |
| Hmotnost | 3.89 g |
| Průměr | 16.0 mm |
| Tloušťka | |
| Tvar | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientace | |
| Rytci | |
| V oběhu do | |
| Reference | BCD Peloponnesos#1727 |
| Popis líce | Helmeted head of Athena Alea facing right, helmet decorated with Triton casting a stone towards the right |
|---|---|
| Písmo líce | |
| Opis líce | |
| Popis rubu | Owl standing left, head facing and on olive branch |
| Písmo rubu | |
| Opis rubu | |
| Hrana | |
| Mincovna | |
| Náklad |
ND (370 BC - 350 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 9978590080 |
| Další informace |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by Tegea, a prominent Arcadian city-state, during the turbulent period of 370-350 BC. Following the decline of Spartan hegemony and the rise of Theban power, this era saw increased autonomy for Peloponnesian cities. Tegea, a member of the Arcadian League, utilized such bronze coinage to facilitate local commerce and assert its civic identity amidst shifting regional alliances. These issues were crucial for daily transactions, complementing the larger silver denominations reserved for inter-state trade or significant payments.
Artistry: The artistry on this Dichalkon reflects the Late Classical stylistic school prevalent in the Peloponnese. While specific engravers are rarely identified for such civic bronze issues, the design would have typically featured a local deity or significant civic emblem. Given Tegea's importance, a depiction related to Athena Alea or a local hero like Herakles would be plausible. The small flan size (16mm) necessitated a concise yet recognizable design, executed with a robust, utilitarian aesthetic rather than the intricate detail found on larger silver pieces.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 3.89 grams and measuring 16.0 millimeters, this bronze Dichalkon exhibits characteristics typical of its module and period. High-points, such as the hair or facial features on an obverse deity, or prominent elements of a reverse emblem, would be susceptible to wear. Bronze coinage often displays less precise striking than silver, with common occurrences of minor planchet irregularities, off-center strikes, or areas of weaker impression, which are expected for a utilitarian issue of this type.