Katalog
| İhraççı | Meliboia |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 352 BC - 344 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Para birimi | Drachm |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 5.43 g |
| Çap | 17.0 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | SNG Munich 12#112, BCD Thessaly I#1196, Rogers#390, BCD Thessaly II#448 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Head of the nymph Meliboeia facing, turned slight to left, and with her hair entwined with bunches of grapes |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Two bunches of grapes on branch |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Greek |
| Arka yüz lejandı | ΜΕΛΙΒΟΕΩΝ |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (352 BC - 344 BC) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 9634984680 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by Meliboia, a significant coastal city in Magnesia, Thessaly, from 352 to 344 BC. This turbulent era saw intense inter-city rivalries and increasing Macedonian power under Philip II. Meliboia, likely possessing a vital port, asserted civic identity and economic autonomy through its local bronze coinage. Such issues were crucial for daily transactions, reflecting the city's self-governance before Macedonian hegemony over Thessaly.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, this Dichalkon adhered to the established Thessalian numismatic tradition of the 4th century BC. Designs often featured finely rendered deities or local personifications on the obverse, such as Athena or Zeus, reflecting the city’s patron gods. The reverse frequently depicted symbols relevant to Meliboia’s maritime identity, like a ship's prow or a trident, executed with a naturalistic yet robust style characteristic of the period’s artistic zenith.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze, this Dichalkon weighs 5.43 grams and measures 17.0 millimeters, typical dimensions for the denomination. Bronze coinage of this period often exhibits variable strike quality compared to silver, with potential for minor flan irregularities or off-center strikes. Key high-points for preservation include facial features and hair details on the obverse, and intricate elements of the reverse design. Clarity of legend and definition of central motifs are paramount, alongside the metal's condition, susceptible to corrosion.