カタログ
| 発行体 | Heraia |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 380 BC - 350 BC |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| 通貨 | Drachm |
| 材質 | Bronze |
| 重量 | 1.82 g |
| 直径 | 13 mm |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 製造技法 | Hammered |
| 向き | |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 | BCD Peloponnesos#1363 |
| 表面の説明 | Helmeted head of Athena facing left |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | |
| 表面の銘文 | |
| 裏面の説明 | Large H with four dots around it |
| 裏面の文字体系 | |
| 裏面の銘文 | |
| 縁 | |
| 鋳造所 | |
| 鋳造数 |
ND (380 BC - 350 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 8425497580 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by the Arcadian city of Heraia during the late Classical period, specifically between 380 BC and 350 BC. This era in the Peloponnese was marked by significant political upheaval, including the decline of Spartan hegemony and the rise of the Arcadian League. Heraia, while not a major power, maintained its civic autonomy and participated in the regional economy, necessitating the issuance of small denomination bronze coinage like this Dichalkon for daily transactions and local commerce, underscoring its functional role within the broader Hellenic economic system.
Artistry: The engraver of this small bronze Dichalkon remains anonymous, a common characteristic for such utilitarian issues of the period. Stylistically, it adheres to the late Classical Greek tradition, which emphasized a refined naturalism and dignified representation. Coinage from Heraia typically featured the city's patron goddess, Hera, often depicted in a profile bust, reflecting the city's religious identity and civic pride. The reverse designs, while generally simpler, would often incorporate an ethnic inscription, a local symbol, or an agricultural motif pertinent to the Arcadian landscape, executed with varying degrees of finesse.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 1.82 grams and measuring 13 millimeters, this Dichalkon represents a standard small bronze denomination. For grading, key high-points to examine on a typical Hera head design would include the details of the hair, the forehead, nose, and chin. The technical strike quality often varies for bronze issues of this period; assessors would look for aspects such as centering, completeness of the strike, die wear, and the overall integrity of the flan. While not always perfectly round or struck, a well-centered and clearly rendered example would be highly prized.