Katalog
| İhraççı | Tegea |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 370 BC - 350 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Para birimi | Drachm |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 2.75 g |
| Çap | 14.0 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | HGC 5#1060, BCD Peloponnesos#1728 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Helmeted head of Athena Alea facing right, helmet decorated with Triton casting a stone towards the right |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Owl standing right, head facing and on olive branch |
| Arka yüz yazısı | |
| Arka yüz lejandı | |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (370 BC - 350 BC) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 8363813050 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by Tegea during 370-350 BC, a pivotal Peloponnesian period. Following Sparta's defeat at Leuctra (371 BC), Tegea, a leading Arcadian city, asserted its independence within the newly formed Arcadian League. This era saw a shift from Spartan hegemony, with Tegea often aligning with Thebes. Its minting of local bronze coinage signifies Tegea's growing economic autonomy and administrative capacity, facilitating daily commerce amidst significant political realignment.
Artistry: While the engraver remains anonymous, this Tegean Dichalkon adheres to the Late Classical stylistic school. Coins of this era display greater naturalism and expressiveness, even on small bronze denominations. Iconography typically featured a prominent civic deity or symbol reflecting Tegea's identity. This often included Athena Alea, whose renowned temple stood in the city, or other Arcadian figures like Pan or Zeus Lykaios. The execution, simplified for a small bronze flan, aimed to capture the essence of these powerful civic emblems.
Technical/Grading: This Dichalkon, weighing 2.75 grams and measuring 14.0 millimeters, is a typical small bronze issue of the Late Classical period. Strike quality varies considerably. High-points of the design, such as hair or prominent facial features, are susceptible to weak striking or accelerated wear. Collectors should anticipate minor off-centering, uneven planchet, and die wear, common for these utilitarian issues. A well-centered strike with clear details on the high-points would be exceptional for the type.