Catalogue
| Émetteur | Mantinea |
|---|---|
| Année | 300 BC - 270 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Devise | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Poids | 3.26 g |
| Diamètre | |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) |
| Description de l’avers | Laureate head of Poseidon or Zeus facing right |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | Poseidon, seen from behind, striding left and hurling a thunderbolt |
| Écriture du revers | Greek |
| Légende du revers | |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (300 BC - 270 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 7281885930 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: The Dichalkon from Mantinea, issued between 300 BC and 270 BC, originates from a dynamic period in Arcadian history. Following the decline of Macedonian influence, Mantinea, a significant Arcadian polis, navigated a complex political landscape amidst shifting alliances and the rise of regional leagues. This bronze coinage was vital for local commerce and asserting civic identity, reflecting the city-state's efforts to maintain economic stability and autonomy prior to its later definitive entry into the Achaean League.
Artistry: While specific engravers are typically unknown for bronze issues of this era, the Dichalkon’s artistry reflects the Late Classical to Early Hellenistic stylistic transition. Designs often feature a prominent deity or allegorical figure on the obverse, such as a local nymph or a head of Zeus Lykaios, blending classical idealism with nascent Hellenistic realism. The reverse commonly displays an animal, agricultural symbol, or civic emblem, like a tripod or ear of wheat, conveying Mantinea's cultural heritage and local pride through recognizable iconography.
Technical/Grading: This bronze Dichalkon, weighing 3.26 grams, presents typical challenges for ancient bronze coinage. High-points, such as hair, facial features, or prominent reverse elements, are frequently susceptible to wear or incomplete strike. A well-preserved example exhibits strong detail in these areas. Technical strike qualities often include some off-centring, granular surfaces from the flan’s casting, and occasional die breaks. Collectors evaluate based on device clarity, flan integrity, and overall preservation, noting full, even strikes are less common than on contemporary silver issues.