Katalog
| Emitent | Aigeira |
|---|---|
| Rok | 40 BC - 30 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Waluta | Drachm |
| Skład | Bronze |
| Waga | 1.75 g |
| Średnica | 12.0 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | SNG Copenhagen#130 |
| Opis awersu | Forepart of goat facing right |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | Greek |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Inscription within wreath |
| Pismo rewersu | Greek |
| Legenda rewersu | ΔΡΑ |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (40 BC - 30 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 4812317750 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon, issued by the Achaean city of Aigeira between 40 and 30 BC, falls within a tumultuous period of Roman history, specifically the Triumviral Wars. Following the Battle of Philippi in 42 BC, Greece remained under significant Roman influence, with various cities navigating allegiances to Mark Antony, Octavian, or maintaining a degree of local autonomy. Aigeira, though part of the former Achaean League, continued to mint its own bronze coinage for local circulation, reflecting its civic identity amidst the broader Roman provincial administration.
Artistry: While specific engravers for Aigeiran bronzes of this era remain anonymous, the coin's design adheres to a late Hellenistic stylistic tradition, often characterized by a blend of classical ideals and a burgeoning provincial realism. Typical iconography for Aigeira includes the head of Zeus Homagyrios on the obverse, rendered with a dignified yet somewhat generalized expression, and a representation of a goat or cult statue on the reverse, referencing the city's name and local deities. The artistic execution, though often simplified for bronze issues, aims for clear recognition of its civic symbols.
Technical/Grading: This Dichalkon, at 1.75 grams and 12.0 millimeters, is a small civic bronze. Technical strike quality is often variable, commonly exhibiting slight off-centering or areas of weakness, particularly on high points like Zeus's hair or the goat's horns. The small flan can result in incomplete design capture. Key grading factors include the clarity of central motifs, overall strike pressure, and surface preservation, all contributing to numismatic appeal.