Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Dichalkon

Uitgever Pharkadon
Jaar 400 BC - 350 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A large crescent open downward occupies the upper field, beneath which a six-rayed star is centrally placed. The ethnic legend ΦΑΡΚ and ΔΟΝΙΟ (abbreviated form of ΦΑΡΚΑΔΟΝΙΩΝ) is divided across the field in two lines, rendered in archaic Greek characters. The design is bold and schematic, typical of small Thessalian bronze civic coinage of the early fourth century BC.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (400 BC - 350 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

Pharkadon was a minor polis in Thessaliotis, the westernmost of Thessaly's four tetrads, and its autonomous bronze coinage is among the more obscure municipal issues of the region. The city sat along the Peneios river and held enough local standing to mint, but never enough to produce issues in quantity — which explains why even the BCD collection, the most comprehensive Thessalian hoard ever assembled, recorded this type under a single lot with variants noted but not fully resolved.

The "var." qualifiers against all three references suggest this piece diverges in die detail from the canonical examples — worth cross-checking against the Rogers plate specimens.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT