Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Denier - Unknown ruler
| Uitgever | Unified Moravia and Margraviate |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1130-1140 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Crude hammered silver denier of irregular flan with a highly stylized central design, likely depicting a seated or standing figure in a schematic rendering typical of Moravian bracteate-influenced deniers of the early twelfth century. To the right of the central device, a cross with a globule at its base is visible, a common motif on contemporary Bohemian and Moravian coinage. The overall design is executed in a primitive, flat relief characteristic of the period, with no legible legend present in the field. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
VP#240 sits in a poorly documented gap in Moravian numismatic history — the 1130s saw overlapping claims among the Přemyslid princes administering the Moravian appanages, making firm attribution to a single ruler genuinely difficult. The "unified" designation reflects a brief administrative consolidation rather than any clean dynastic moment, and the anonymous nature of this striking is itself historically telling: several Moravian deniers of this decade deliberately omit ruler identification, possibly during periods of contested succession.