Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Unified Moravia and Margraviate |
|---|---|
| Year | 1055-1197 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Denier |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Central field features a frontal bust or stylized effigy, possibly a ruler or ecclesiastical figure, enclosed within a beaded inner circle. A cross patée surmounts the design at the top, echoing the obverse motif. The surrounding field contains fragmentary Latin lettering distributed around the inner border, largely indistinct due to the crude hammered technique and worn flan edges. The overall artistic treatment is consistent with Bohemian-Moravian deniers of the late 11th to late 12th century, displaying a flat, linear rendering typical of the period's provincial minting tradition. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (1055-1197) |
| Additional information |
The deniers of unified Moravia present one of the more stubborn attribution problems in Central European medieval numismatics. Bohemian and Moravian issues from this stretch overlap considerably in style, and the absence of reliable written mint records leaves many pieces circulating through auction catalogs under deliberately vague attributions. Decades of scholarship — particularly Czech work from the 1970s onward — has narrowed some assignments by die linkage, but a meaningful portion of the series remains unresolved.
The Margraviate changed hands repeatedly among Přemyslid branches after 1055, complicating attribution further. Coins struck under different margraves were often produced at the same facilities with shared or recut dies.