Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Kingdom of Bohemia |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1125-1140 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Within a beaded circle, the duke is depicted in dynamic combat pose, brandishing a sword and holding a shield, engaged in battle against wild beasts — likely a lion and a serpent or dragon — rendered in a vivid Romanesque style characteristic of Bohemian hammered coinage of the first half of the twelfth century. The scene conveys princely valor and martial authority. A fragmentary Latin legend runs along the outer border. The image visible on the coin shows a warrior figure grappling with a large feline beast, consistent with the described iconography. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (1125-1140) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Sobeslaus I consolidated Bohemian ducal power after defeating the German-backed claimant Otto II of Olomouc at the Battle of Chlumec in 1126, a victory that secured his reign and removed the principal threat of Přemyslid internal fragmentation for a generation. The billon deniers struck under his authority reflect a mint operating with reasonable consistency through an unusually stable fifteen-year rule.
Cach 582 is among the better-documented varieties of his coinage, cross-referenced in both Šmerda and Donebauer without significant attribution disputes — a relative rarity for Bohemian bracteate-adjacent issues of this period.