See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier - Sobeslaus I

Issuer Kingdom of Bohemia
Year 1125-1140
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Within a beaded circle, the duke is depicted in dynamic combat pose, brandishing a sword and holding a shield, engaged in battle against wild beasts — likely a lion and a serpent or dragon — rendered in a vivid Romanesque style characteristic of Bohemian hammered coinage of the first half of the twelfth century. The scene conveys princely valor and martial authority. A fragmentary Latin legend runs along the outer border. The image visible on the coin shows a warrior figure grappling with a large feline beast, consistent with the described iconography.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (1125-1140)
Additional information

Sobeslaus I consolidated Bohemian ducal power after defeating the German-backed claimant Otto II of Olomouc at the Battle of Chlumec in 1126, a victory that secured his reign and removed the principal threat of Přemyslid internal fragmentation for a generation. The billon deniers struck under his authority reflect a mint operating with reasonable consistency through an unusually stable fifteen-year rule.

Cach 582 is among the better-documented varieties of his coinage, cross-referenced in both Šmerda and Donebauer without significant attribution disputes — a relative rarity for Bohemian bracteate-adjacent issues of this period.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE