Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Denier realist style, crozier at right
| Issuer | Priory of Souvigny |
|---|---|
| Year | 1100-1200 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Denier (1⁄240) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Plain cross with slightly splayed arms set within a beaded inner circle, dividing the field into four quarters. The cross arms terminate with right-angled branches. The surrounding Latin legend reads SILVINIACO, with a distinctive pointed letter N noted as a diagnostic feature of this emission. A cross pommee or cross pattee stops the legend at the left. The die work is typical of the rough hammered style of 12th-century feudal French priory coinage. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Souvigny was one of the most politically significant Cluniac houses in France — the burial site of two abbots of Cluny, Mayeul and Odilo, both later canonized, which made the priory a major pilgrimage destination and gave its priors unusual leverage to demand and defend minting rights. The deniers struck there reflect that authority directly.
Boudeau and Duplessy both assign this type cautiously across the full twelfth century, a span that reflects genuine uncertainty rather than laziness — documentary evidence for the priory's mint is thin, and attribution rests primarily on typological comparison with neighboring Bourbonnais issues.