Denier - Paschal I and emperor Louis I

発行体 Papal States
年号 817-824
種類 Standard circulation coin
額面 1 Denier
通貨 Denier (772-983)
材質 Silver
重量 1.48 g
直径 23 mm
厚さ
形状 Round (irregular)
製造技法 Hammered
向き Variable alignment ↺
彫刻師
流通終了年
参考文献 CNI XV#1 (p.67), Munt#1 (p.5), Berman#17
表面の説明 Papal monogram in a beaded circle, legend around.
表面の文字体系 Latin
表面の銘文 PS CAL ✠ • SCS PETRVS •
(Translation: Paschal. Saint Peter.)
裏面の説明 City monogram in a beaded circle, legend around.
裏面の文字体系 Latin
裏面の銘文 ROMA ✠ LVDOVVICS IMP
(Translation: Rome. Emperor Louis.)
鋳造所
鋳造数 ND (817-824) - -
Numisquare ID 2505104530
追加情報

Historical Context: This silver denier was issued during Paschal I's pontificate (817-824), a significant era in the early Carolingian Empire. Paschal I managed the intricate relationship with Emperor Louis I "the Pious." The coin's dual inscription, bearing both the Pope's and Emperor's names, powerfully symbolized the *renovatio imperii* and the intertwined spiritual and temporal authorities. It affirmed the Papal States' right to issue coinage, while acknowledging imperial suzerainty, a crucial political statement for ninth-century Rome.

Artistry: The design, referenced as CNI XV#1, Munt#1, and Berman#17, showcases the early medieval numismatic aesthetic. Engravers are anonymous; the style reflects prevailing Roman minting practices, influenced by Carolingian prototypes. A typical design features a central cross with the Pope's name (PASCHALIS) in the angles on the obverse. The reverse commonly displays a stylized temple facade or a monogram, encircled by the Emperor's name (LUDOVICUS IMP). This potent iconography effectively conveyed authority and legitimacy.

Technical/Grading: Struck in silver, approximately 1.48 grams and 23 millimeters, this denier conforms to Carolingian monetary standards. Manual striking often resulted in irregularities: off-center strikes, minor flan imperfections, or inconsistent pressure. For the temple design, the roof pediment and column tops are common high-points prone to wear. Collectors prioritize clarity of legends and definition of central devices. Well-centered, fully struck examples are highly valued, despite technical limitations of early medieval minting.

×