Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | County of Soissons |
|---|---|
| Year | 1000-1037 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Central field depicts a highly stylized schematic representation of a church façade or temple, rendered in a primitive Romanesque manner typical of early 11th-century feudal coinage. The structure features a triangular pediment above a columned portal, with a horizontal baseline beneath. A circular Latin legend encircles the central temple motif along the coin's periphery, naming the city of Soissons as the place of issue. The overall design is bold but crudely executed, reflecting the artisanal workshop practices of the period. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Odo II was one of the most powerful and ambitious magnates in early 11th-century France, holding simultaneously the counties of Blois, Chartres, Champagne, and Meaux, and repeatedly contesting the kingdom of Burgundy through both diplomacy and force. His eventual death at the Battle of Bar in 1037 — fighting against Emperor Conrad II — ended a career of near-constant territorial expansion. That Soissons issued in his name reflects the degree to which comital authority had fragmented Carolingian administrative geography into competing minting jurisdictions by this period.
The absence of Boudeau and Poey d'Avant references suggests this type remains unplaced in the standard French feudal corpus — a genuine attribution gap rather than a cataloging oversight.